The authors reported the exam-retest precision since: Roentgen

Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: «Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body»; «What do you wish you looked like?»; «What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?»; «What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?» Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. _tt= 0.82 («actual»); R_tt= 0.77 («ideal»); R_tt= 0.71 («attractive»); and those of convergent validity as: R_cit= 0.73 («actual» and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).

Dieting discipline try mentioned by the Fat reduction Measure of Eating Perceptions Sample (EAT) (Garner, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of 16 statements obtained to your an effective 6-part measure (never = 0/constantly = 5), which have large results indicating an advanced level of restrained restaurants. For the Eat psychometrical qualities select Gather ainsi que al. (1982). New surface coefficient for products, the latest Mexican and you may German of them, is of the identical worth, an alpha of 0.76.

Slimming down restraint

Ineffectiveness measure. The fresh new bad apply to basis is projected from Ineffectiveness Size of the new Dinner Problems Index (EDI) (Garner et al., 1983), which has shown a beneficial convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) out-of Roentgen = 0.70 (p

Medical teams took the weight and you will level actions

Body mass index (BMI). Bmi are calculated just like the pounds inside kilograms split from the level in square m (Body mass index = kg/m2).

Prior to study collection, good pilot study of the fresh Silhouettes Level (Shape step 1), applied to a sample comprising 20 North american country people, was used to evaluate this new appropriateness of the data so you can portray human body products, to help you validate good acceptation off an as yet not known set of silhouettes and a clear knowledge of the new directions (the fresh German classification currently mentioned having studies within this value). The results exhibited this new Outline Scale try a beneficial otherwise a keen appropriate means to the North american country shot.

The new detectives of the two places, on Mexico Urban area and at Hae (standardized) processes. Brand new surveys had been put on groups of scientific and breastfeeding children during the North american country and Italian language universities. One of the reasons behind the fresh new ples away from college students about treatments try only the focus you to definitely (you can assume) such young adults have to have on scientific career and for health problems, which makes them way more tuned in to issues such as for example ED. Told consent was taken from the research players. Every called students agreed to participate. New respective regional internationalwomen.net enlace Гєtil stability committees accepted the latest low-invasive procedure. Top-notch translators undertook and you can managed this new translation and you will retranslation of the tools.

Age. The mean age of Mexican women (M_age = 20.4, _SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for