Robert J. Steinfeld, “Possessions and Suffrage in the early American Republic,” Stanford Law Opinion 41, no. dos (January 1989): 356, 364; Nancy F. Cott, “Relationship and you may Ladies’ Citizenship in the us, 1830–1934,” American Historic Opinion 103, no. 5 (December 1998): 1451–1454.
The women which composed the new anti-suffrage petition to Congress had written they in the article pages off Godey’s Lady’s Book and you may Journal, a well-known month-to-month periodical notorious for the campaign of just what historians enjoys titled “new cult from domesticity,” so you’re able to gather tens of thousands of signatures for the speech to Congress
Stephanie McCurry, “The 2 Face away from Republicanism: Gender and you will Proslavery Government inside the Antebellum South carolina,” Record from Western Records 78, zero. cuatro (March 1992): 1252–1259, 1263–1264.
William J. Novak, “The new Courtroom Conversion process of Citizenship when you look at the Nineteenth-Century The usa Д°sveГ§li kadД±nlar arkadaЕџlД±k sitesi,” from inside the T the guy Democratic Sense: The fresh new Directions from inside the Western Governmental Record , ed. Novak, and you will Julian E. Zelizer (Princeton, NJ: Princeton School Press, 2003), 93–98, 105–112.
Ellen Carol DuBois, “Outgrowing the fresh new Compact of your own Fathers: Equivalent Liberties, Woman-suffrage, in addition to United states Structure, 1820–1878,” Log out of American History 74, no. step 3 ( Winkler, “A trend Too-soon: Woman Suffragists and also the ‘Lifestyle Structure,’” New york School Legislation Opinion 76, no. 5 (2001): 1456–1526.
Faye Elizabeth. Dudden, Fighting Chance: The latest Challenge more than Woman suffrage and you may Black Suffrage in the Repair The united states (Nyc: Oxford College or university Push, 2011), 124; with the anti-suffragists during the Arizona, DC, come across Susan Age. Marshall, Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and Group regarding the Campaign facing Woman suffrage (Madison: College or university off Wisconsin Press, 1997) , 19–23.
The fresh petitioners had been culturally and you can politically influential women. Phelps did not sign the brand new petition, however, she advertised they and most likely set it to have guide for the Godey’s. Married anti-suffrage women tend to implemented the latest customs of being acquiesced by Mrs. [husband’s complete name], a social meeting you to mirrored coverture, family members lineage, and you can public status. Almira Lincoln Phelps, “Female’s Rights: An earnest Movement against the fresh new Extension of your Suffrage-Target on Female of the country,” New york Moments, March twenty-seven, 1871; Marshall, Splintered Sisterhood, 20; “A Consistent Separation and divorce Laws-The fresh Movement on the Anti-Suffrage Woman,” il Tribune, November dos, 1871; Age Cady Stanton, Susan Brownell Anthony, and you can Matilda Joslyn Gage, eds., History of Woman-suffrage, vol. step 3, 1861–1876 (Ny: Fowler & Really, 1882), 494–495; To the petitions and remonstrances, come across Susan Zaeske, Signatures from Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery, and Women’s Governmental Term (Chapel Slope: College from North carolina Drive, 2003).
Caroline Fairchild Corbin, Emails away from a chimney-Corner: A Plea to have Sheer Dreams and you may Respectful Relationships ranging from Guys and you may Feminine (Chicago: Fergus, 1886), cited from inside the Statement of Senate Select Panel on the Woman-suffrage for the “Views of the Minority” [to Go with S. Res. 5], 49th Cong., next sess., S. Rept. 70, step one (April 30, 1886); Rix, “Gender and you can Reconstitution,” 89.
Congressional Number, 47th Cong., 1st sess., 229 (1881), cited from inside the Siegel, “She the people,” 1001. John Tyler Morgan was a former Confederate brigadier standard, an effective descendant away from Chairman John Tyler from Virginia, and you may a designer regarding white supremacy during the Alabama. Look for Encyclopedia from Alabama .
Meg Jacobs, William J
Siegel, “She individuals,” 1000n160, 1003; on the “redemption of one’s North,” come across Keyssar, To Choose, 96–138. As the Keyssar notes, from the middle-1870s, a great number of personal intellectuals and you may political figures lamented the newest use out of common cock suffrage from the aftermath of Municipal Combat, in the middle of profile regarding Reconstruction’s problems and also the increase out-of immigration, industrialization, the newest governmental hosts, and you can change moves. Looking they impracticable so you’re able to limitation penis suffrage, northern opponents from democracy resorted so you’re able to controlling the regularity, strategies, and you will scope out of political inquiries during the local and you may condition elections and you may enacting voter subscription legislation to deal with this new electorate. A northern and you will west variation of southern disfranchisement, these methods out of cutting democratic contribution and you will direct image appeared less than expanding analysis about 1890s–1910s, fueling not simply Populism and in addition woman-suffrage as part of a more impressive reform coalition.
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.